‘He’, the man and ‘the boy’ are nameless. Why? Does their anonymity change the way we feel about the characters? Can we still care about them without names? Do they still have an identity without a name?
I think that their anonymity allows readers to make their own opinions on them, their situation and the events that will occur. It means that they are more mysterious, an in a way, have a vulnerability about them because we don’t know their story. I definitely think we can still care about them and throughout the book, we can get to know them and understand their identity better, regardless of their names.
How can we tell they’re in danger? Are they fleeing danger or do they expect to encounter it along the way? What sort of danger? Human? Animal? Elemental?
In the extract, the line ‘In the knapsacks were essentials things in case they had to abandon the cart and make a run for it’ certainly suggests that they are fleeing from something since they’ve packed up their essentials. Also, knowing that they may have to make a run for it insinuates that they expect to encounter more danger along the way. It’s not clear what exactly this danger will be but clearly, they are using survival instincts and have a mirror to ‘watch the road behind them’ in case of danger.
The chrome motorcycle mirror tells us the time is roughly contemporary. So what’s happened to the rest of the recognisable contemporary world? Or is the story set in the future? Post-apocalypse maybe?
Since McCarthy described it as a ‘wasted country’ we can assume that there has been widespread destruction of some kind. As the readers, we know that the road is empty and danger is likely so something has certainly happened to the contemporary world. It is also possible that the story is set in the future, post-apocalypse as the conditions and element of danger would fit this.
They are alone: ‘The road was empty’. Where is everyone? Why are they scared if no one is around? Because no one is around? Because someone might be around?
Assuming there was a big disaster, there probably was some population loss and it’s likely that there is a lack of resources. The fact that they are travelling with their essentials puts them at risk of violence from others because people often return to their survival instincts when faced with danger. Also as the road is currently empty there is a fear of the unknown and since may be caught off guard.
There’s been some sort of disaster: ‘wasted country…dead reeds…shuffling through the ash…’ What sort of disaster might it be?
Clearly, it was not just a localised event and something much more extreme, affecting the whole country, this could have been a natural disaster like a supervolcano eruption (hence the ash and dead reeds) or again, the idea of an apocalypse seems possible. Other options of the cause could be a war of some kind or perhaps an invasion, maybe from beyond the contemporary world?
They’re on a journey with everything they own. Where are they going? Where have they come from?
I would assume that they have come from somewhere they were once familiar with but have been forced to flee it due to the disaster and danger they face. As a result, it seems logical that they are on a journey to find safety, it’s unclear if they have a specific destination in mind or if the journey is simply to get as far away as possible.
The road is mentioned three times in these few lines. It is also the title of the book? What does it symbolise?
Obviously, the road symbolises their physical journey but it can also refer to the mental journey that the man and the boy will go through, they are faced with danger, hardship and the unknown so it’s likely that their physical and mental strength will be tested. It may also symbolise the journey of the readers as we learn more about the characters and events as the book progresses.
Can you spot any poetic devices in this short passage? What effect do they have?
This extract is littered with examples of imagery and it gives us a small introduction to the setting, for example, ‘the chrome motorcycle mirror’ and ‘the wasted country’ and small bits of information that allow the readers to visualise a desolate land and two characters embarking on a journey. We can also see examples of metaphors – ‘the grey serpentine of a river’ and ‘the gunmetal light’, both of which add to the sense of emptiness, mystery and danger.
What other stylistic language choices does McCarthy make and why? What might he not punctuate speech?
McCarthy may not punctuate speech because he made the choice to use an omniscient narrator which gives the impression that we are watching and overhearing the action, rather than being directly part of it. He also uses short sentences which gives us just enough information whilst keeping us guessing.
What features give a sense of where we are? How does McCarthy create a post-apocalyptic world? Would the impact be the same if he were to remove the man and the boy? Look carefully at the imagery, for example, the grey ‘serpentine of the river’ and ‘the gunmetal light’. What is it about the choice of metaphor that creates a sense of danger? What does serpentine symbolise? Think biblical perhaps. What effect will biblical and religious imagery, themes and symbols have in this genre of writing?
We can get an idea about being in a bleak and desolate area by the use of imagery – ‘the wasted country’, the ’empty’ road, ‘shuffling through the ash’ and ‘the still grey serpentine of a river’. I think that if the man and the boy were removed then the sense of danger doesn’t seem as significant since we don’t know anyone is affected or at risk. A sense of danger is definitely created by his choice of metaphor with the ‘serpentine of the river’ and ‘the gunmetal light’ – for starters, the mention of a gun automatically makes you think of violence and danger. Also, the word ‘serpentine’ symbolises a snake figure which again is a creature that can be very dangerous. In regards to the bible, a snake can certainly symbolise evil but is also used as a symbol for life and healing so perhaps the river may be something pointing the man and the boy towards a better place, or simply a place of more danger. Including features that have religious and biblical connotations can affect the way in which readers react because people may have different beliefs, this can change the way in which McCarthy intended for people to understand the story.
What’s the prose style like? Are the sentences long or short? Are they rhythmic or choppy or stark? What impact does this have? Is the language complex or simple? Often the more dramatic or dark a piece is, the more simple and stripped back the prose. Why might this be? What would be the effect of a more flowing, colourful and detailed prose?
The sentences are longer at the beginning of the extract but still feel quite staccato and as if McCarthy is introducing fear through a quick pace. This is shown further by the short and choppy sentences, for instance ‘The road was empty…Motionless and precise.’ I personally think that this adds to the tension and insinuates the idea of danger and urgency, it also makes it feel more dramatic and like time can’t be wasted. The language is fairly simple but McCarthy is still able to use imagery to help the reads visualise the world. The style of prose he uses fits with the genre and mood of the story, if it was too colourful and detailed then I think the readers wouldn’t feel as on edge about the boy and the man.
How does it all make you feel?
I’m certainly confused and uncertain about all the events leading up to the current state of the world McCarthy is depicting but I think the element of mystery means that I’m also more intrigued to find out more.